The Effects of Minimal Shoes on Ankle Kinematics During Running: A Systematic Review

Document Type : Review Article

Authors

1 Department of Sports Injuries and Biomechanics, Faculty of Sports Sciences and Health, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

2 Department of Sports Injuries and Biomechanics, Faculty of Sports Sciences and Health, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Minimal shoes may alter ankle kinematics while running. This study aimed to systematically review studies investigating ankle kinematics in runners while wearing minimalist shoes versus traditional shoes and barefoot. Four databases including PubMed (128 studies), Web of science (224), Scopus (242 studies) and Embase (148 studies) were searched from inception to Aug 9, 2022. Two reviewers screened studies to identify studies reporting the effects of minimal shoes on ankle kinematics during running. Eleven studies with a total of 203 (wearing minimal shoes) participants and 18 controls (8 participants wearing minimal shoes without gait training and 10 wearing standard shoes) were included. The study design of the included studies were RCTs (2 studies), prospective study (1), cross-sectional study (5), and crossover (3). The Downs and Black appraisal scale was applied to assess the quality of included studies. The results showed that minimal shoe was capable of changing the kinematics of ankle while running. Uncushioned minimal shoes decreased ankle dorsiflexion at initial contact and ankle adduction, and increased plantarflexion moment, strike index, total ROM and joint excursion in stance phase compared to traditional shoes. Standardizing shoes and speeds are needed for reliable comparisons among studies. Because most studies examining the efficacy of minimal shoes, had a low level of evidence, further studies providing valid and high-quality evidence which include RCTs are required to support clinical practice in the use of minimal shoes. Uncushioned minimal shoes are better replicating barefoot running. Therefore, it is recommended for runners since they can change their foot strike pattern to mid-foot or forefoot and consequently reduce peak impact force, resulting in preventing future injuries especially in the knee.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Van Middelkoop M, Kolkman J, Van Ochten J, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, Koes BW. Risk factors for lower extremity injuries among male marathon runners. Scand J Med Sci Sport. 2008; 18(6): 691-697. doi:10.1111/J.1600-0838.2007.00768.X
  2. Shipway R, Holloway I. Running free: Embracing a healthy lifestyle through distance running. Perspect Public Health. 2010; 130(6): 270-276. doi:10.1177/1757913910379191
  3. Taunton JE, Ryan MB, Clement DB, McKenzie DC, Lloyd-Smith DR, Zumbo BD. A retrospective case-control analysis of 2002 running injuries. Br J Sports Med. 2002; 36(2): 95-101.
  4. Alvero-Cruz JR, Carnero EA, García MAG, et al. Predictive Performance Models in Long-Distance Runners: A Narrative Review. Int J Environ Res Public Heal 2020, Vol 17, Page 8289. 2020; 17(21): 8289. doi:10.3390/IJERPH17218289
  5. Hoseini Y, Alemzade M. The Immediate Effect of the Use of Arch Support Insole on the Components of Ground Reaction Forces during Running in People with Functional Ankle Instability. J Adv Sport Technol. 2021; 5(2): 36-46. doi:10.22098/jast.2021.1377
  6. McCarthy C, Fleming N, Donne B, Blanksby B. 12 Weeks of simulated barefoot running changes foot-strike patterns in female runners. Int J Sports Med. 2014; 35(5): 443-450. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1353215
  7. Mousavi SH, Hijmans JM, Rajabi R, Diercks R, Zwerver J, van der Worp H. Kinematic risk factors for lower limb tendinopathy in distance runners: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gait Posture. 2019; 69: 13-24. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.01.011
  8. Jafarnezhadgero AA, Sorkhe E, Oliveira AS. Motion-control shoes help maintaining low loading rate levels during fatiguing running in pronated female runners. Gait Posture. 2019; 73: 65-70. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.07.133
  9. Jafarnezhadgero A, Sorkhe E, Meamarbashi A. Efficacy of motion control shoes for reducing the frequency response of ground reaction forces in fatigued runners. J Adv Sport Technol. 2019; 3(1): 8-21. https://jast.uma.ac.ir/article_763.html
  10. Hannigan JJ, Pollard CD. Differences in running biomechanics between a maximal, traditional, and minimal running shoe. J Sci Med Sport. 2020; 23(1): 15-19. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2019.08.008
  11. Videbæk S, Bueno AM, Nielsen RO, Rasmussen S. Incidence of Running-Related Injuries Per 1000 h of running in Different Types of Runners: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Med. 2015; 45(7): 1017-1026. doi:10.1007/S40279-015-0333-8
  12. Ferber R, Noehren B, Hamill J, Davis I. Competitive Female Runners With a History of Iliotibial Band Syndrome Demonstrate Atypical Hip and Knee Kinematics. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther. 2010; 40(2): 52-58. doi:10.2519/jospt.2010.3028
  13. Noehren B, Davis I, Hamill J. ASB Clinical Biomechanics Award Winner 2006. Prospective study of the biomechanical factors associated with iliotibial band syndrome. Clin Biomech. 2007; 22(9): 951-956. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.07.001
  14. Smith R, Wegener C, Greene A, Chard A, Fong Yan A. Biomechanics of footwear design. J Foot Ankle Res. 2012; 5(S1). doi:10.1186/1757-1146-5-S1-I1
  15. Wang IL, Graham RB, Bourdon EJP, Chen YM, Gu CY, Wang LI. Biomechanical Analysis of Running Foot Strike in Shoes of Different Mass. J Sports Sci Med. 2020; 19(1): 130-137.
  16. Ridge ST, Johnson AW, Mitchell UH, et al. Foot bone marrow edema after a 10-wk transition to minimalist running shoes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013; 45(7): 1363-1368. doi:10.1249/MSS.0B013E3182874769
  17. Jenkins DW, Cauthon DJ. Barefoot running claims and controversies: A review of the literature. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2011; 101(3): 231-246. doi:10.7547/1010231
  18. Lieberman DE, Venkadesan M, Werbel WA, et al. Foot strike patterns and collision forces in habitually barefoot versus shod runners. Nature. 2010; 463(7280): 531-535. doi:10.1038/nature08723
  19. Warne JP, Smyth BP, Fagan JOCC, et al. Kinetic changes during a six-week minimal footwear and gait-retraining intervention in runners. J Sports Sci. 2017; 35(15): 1538-1546. doi:10.1080/02640414.2016.1224916
  20. Daoud AI, Geissler GJ, Wang F, Saretsky J, Daoud YA, Lieberman DE. Foot strike and injury rates in endurance runners: A retrospective study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012; 44(7): 1325-1334. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182465115
  21. Ryan M, Elashi M, Newsham-West R, Taunton J. Examining injury risk and pain perception in runners using minimalist footwear. Br J Sports Med. 2014; 48(16): 1257-1262. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2012-092061
  22. Esculier JF, Dubois B, Dionne CE, Leblond J, Roy JS. A consensus definition and rating scale for minimalist shoes. J Foot Ankle Res. 2015; 8(1): 1-9. doi:10.1186/S13047-015-0094-5
  23. Esculier JF, Dubois B, Bouyer LJ, McFadyen BJ, Roy JS. Footwear characteristics are related to running mechanics in runners with patellofemoral pain. Gait Posture. 2017; 54: 144-147. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.03.010
  24. Sinclair J, Brooks D, Taylor PJ, Liles NB. Effects of running in minimal, maximal and traditional running shoes: a musculoskeletal simulation exploration using statistical parametric mapping and Bayesian analyses. Footwear Sci. 2021; 13(2): 143-156. doi:10.1080/19424280.2021.1892834
  25. Yang Y, Zhang X, Luo Z, Wang X, Ye D, Fu W. Alterations in Running Biomechanics after 12 Week Gait Retraining with Minimalist Shoes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(3): 818. doi:10.3390/ijerph17030818
  26. Hollander K, Argubi-Wollesen A, Reer R, Zech A. Comparison of minimalist footwear strategies for simulating barefoot running: a randomized crossover study. PLoS One. 2015; 10(5): e0125880. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0125880
  27. Squadrone R, Gallozzi C. Biomechanical and physiological comparison of barefoot and two shod conditions in experienced barefoot runners. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2009; 49(1): 6-13.
  28. Bonacci J, Saunders PU, Hicks A, Rantalainen T, Vicenzino B (Guglielmo) T, Spratford W. Running in a minimalist and lightweight shoe is not the same as running barefoot: a biomechanical study. Br J Sports Med. 2013; 47(6): 387-392. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2012-091837
  29. Ardern CL, Büttner F, Andrade R, et al. Implementing the 27 PRISMA 2020 Statement items for systematic reviews in the sport and exercise medicine, musculoskeletal rehabilitation and sports science fields: the PERSiST (implementing Prisma in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sport medicine and SporTs sc. Br J Sport Med. 2022; 56(4): 175-195. doi:10.1136/BJSPORTS-2021-103987
  30. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998; 52(6): 377-384. doi:10.1136/jech.52.6.377
  31. Willy RW, Davis IS. Kinematic and kinetic comparison of running in standard and minimalist shoes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014; 46(2): 318-323. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182a595d2
  32. Willson JD, Bjorhus JS, Williams DSB 3rd, Butler RJ, Porcari JP, Kernozek TW. Short-term changes in running mechanics and foot strike pattern after introduction to minimalistic footwear. PM R. 2014; 6(1): 34-43; quiz 43. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.08.602
  33. Fredericks W, Swank S, Teisberg M, Hampton B, Ridpath L, Hanna JB. Lower extremity biomechanical relationships with different speeds in traditional, minimalist, and barefoot footwear. J Sports Sci Med. 2015; 14(2): 276-283.
  34. Fuller JT, Buckley JD, Tsiros MD, Brown NAT, Thewlis D. Redistribution of Mechanical Work at the Knee and Ankle Joints During Fast Running in Minimalist Shoes. J Athl Train. 2016; 51(10): 806-812. doi:10.4085/1062-6050-51.12.05
  35. Hébert-Losier K, Finlayson SJ, Lamb PF, et al. Kinematics of recreational male runners in “super”, minimalist and habitual shoes. J Sports Sci. 2022; 40(13): 1426-1435. doi:10.1080/02640414.2022.2081767
  36. Kerrigan DC, Franz JR, Keenan GS, Dicharry J, Della Croce U, Wilder RP. The effect of running shoes on lower extremity joint torques. PM R. 2009; 1(12): 1058-1063. doi:10.1016/J.PMRJ.2009.09.011
  37. Robbins S, Waked E. Factors associated with ankle injuries. Preventive measures. Sports Med. 1998; 25(1): 63-72. doi:10.2165/00007256-199825010-00005
  38. Robbins SE, Hanna AM. Running-related injury prevention through barefoot adaptations. Med & Sci Sport & Exerc. 1987; 19(2): 148-156.
  39. Franz JR, Wierzbinski CM, Kram R. Metabolic cost of running barefoot versus shod: is lighter better? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012; 44(8): 1519-1525. doi:10.1249/MSS.0B013E3182514A88
  40. Olin ED, Gutierrez GM. EMG and tibial shock upon the first attempt at barefoot running. Hum Mov Sci. 2013; 32(2): 343-352. doi:10.1016/J.HUMOV.2012.11.005
  41. Benno Nigg & Hendrik Enders. Barefoot running – some critical considerations. Footwear Sci. 2013; 5(1): 1-7.
  42. Schubert AG, Kempf J, Heiderscheit BC. Influence of Stride Frequency and Length on Running Mechanics. Sports Health. 2013; 6(3): 210-217. doi:10.1177/1941738113508544
  43. Bonacci J, Vicenzino B, Spratford W, Collins P. Take your shoes off to reduce patellofemoral joint stress during running. Br J Sports Med. 2014; 48(6): 425-428. doi:10.1136/BJSPORTS-2013-092160
  44. Perkins KP, Hanney WJ, Rothschild CE. The Risks and Benefits of Running Barefoot or in Minimalist Shoes: A Systematic Review. Sports Health. 2014; 6(6): 475-480. doi:10.1177/1941738114546846
  45. De Wit B, De Clercq D, Aerts P. Biomechanical analysis of the stance phase during barefoot and shod running. J Biomech. 2000; 33(3): 269-278.
Journal of Advanced Sport Technology
Volume 6, Issue 2 - Serial Number 11
November 2022
Pages 20-38

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 01 November 2022
  • Revise Date: 13 November 2022
  • Accept Date: 05 December 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics